Browser odyssey: from arc to chrome

The Arc Experiment

Initial Attraction

Arc browser emerged as a promising alternative to Chrome, offering innovative features:

• Split screen capabilities
• Dedicated spaces for work, personal, and learning contexts
• Intelligent tab management
• Minimal mouse usage through extensive hotkey support

The Shortcomings

Despite initial enthusiasm, critical limitations became apparent:

• Significant battery drain during travel
• Reduced development momentum (shifted to maintenance mode) Video
• Ecosystem integration challenges

1Password: The Unexpected Hero

Beyond Basic Password Management

1Password transformed from a simple credential storage tool to a comprehensive authentication solution:

• Passkey Support: Robust management of modern authentication methods
• TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password): Enhanced security features
• Cross-Platform Sync: Seamless credential access
• Cost Consideration: $36-$60/year, depending on family or individual plan

Migration Motivations

Transitioning from Google Password Manager revealed significant advantages:

• Enhanced security features
• More comprehensive credential ecosystem
• Better integration across devices and platforms

Chrome: The Pragmatic Return

Ecosystem Advantages

Rejoining Chrome offered immediate benefits:

• Seamless Android phone integration
• One-tap OTP authentication
• Faster link sharing between mobile and desktop
• Simplified browsing experience

Missed Arc Features

Noteworthy Arc functionalities left behind:

• Cmd + Shift + C: One-click link copying
• Advanced hotkey navigation
• Minimal mouse interaction workflow

Workflow Philosophy

Tool Selection Principles

Key learnings from the browser migration:

• Prioritize personal productivity over trending features
• Evaluate tools based on actual workflow, not potential
• Consider ecosystem integration
• Balance between innovation and reliability

Emerging Alternatives

Zen Browser: A Cautious Consideration

• Firefox-based engine raised immediate concerns
• Historical issues with media compatibility (e.g., HEVC on macOS)
• Switching browser engines felt like unnecessary complexity
• Strong community and development team, but not compelling enough
• Decision: Not ready to migrate, potential future exploration

Key Hesitation: Switching from Chromium-based browsers to Firefox’s engine seemed like an unnecessary technical risk for marginal gains.

Technical Reflections

Browser Selection Criteria

• Performance: Battery efficiency
• Integration: Cross-device synchronization
• Usability: Workflow optimization
• Security: Modern authentication support

P.S. Technology evolves, workflows adapt. Stay curious, stay flexible.